Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR III, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled 6 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the GR III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh GR III. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh GR III
| TG-2 iHS | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| GR III | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 | June 2013 | Fresher by 63 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 610k | Crisper screen (+427k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR III
| TG-2 iHS | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the GR III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and GR III is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and GR III.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR III will offer you greater detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older TG-2 iHS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GR III |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2018-09-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $900 |