Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was released 7 months before the WG-4 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4
| TG-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WG-4 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2013 | More modern by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-4
| TG-2 iHS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the WG-4.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and WG-4.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $380 | $330 |