Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was announced 19 months earlier than the WG-5 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-2 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
WG-5 GPS | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | June 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
TG-2 iHS | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81764/81764c785fb5b6b93e8ca87835bbd5784a535d51" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14d63/14d63ef919388043d33671031f4e288f9268c2c1" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9456b/9456bb53d3a3e847a2a617e733ed087b15bd15d1" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27988/27988af60e6589a17dc01cff44de991806bed1cd" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $380 | $500 |