Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-6, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the WG-6 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-6
| TG-2 iHS | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WG-6 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | June 2013 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper screen (+430k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-6
| TG-2 iHS | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with outer measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-6 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the WG-6.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WG-6 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and WG-6.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-6 to give you greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 246g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $380 | $271 |