Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 7 months later than the EX2F and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the EX2F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung EX2F
| TG-2 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | December 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX2F | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung EX2F
| TG-2 iHS | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the EX2F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and EX2F.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS has the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field trickier. The fresher TG-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $478 |
