Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- New Model is Samsung GX-20
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is very similar but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 6 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the GX-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | September 2006 | More recent by 83 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| GX-10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10
| TG-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the GX-10.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $380 | $850 |