Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- New Model is Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is very similar but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was brought out 6 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the GX-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
TG-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 83 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
GX-10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10
TG-2 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6d20/e6d20347ba07077b4d1673d9f8199aaa3f2f19c2" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and GX-10 is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcd6c/dcd6c80207f16def60fdb32cf8a8fdd160d87a56" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e42d7/e42d741eecc51583e44ac7f6042665b9967b9906" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0646/d0646d987143e51b702ec150b64e60bf806806c3" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-06-28 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $850 |