Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled 7 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-2 iHS grades against the GX-1L for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1L. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-1L
| TG-2 iHS | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | February 2006 | More recent by 90 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 210k | Clearer display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| GX-1L | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1L
| TG-2 iHS | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the GX-1L.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and GX-1L is 91 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and GX-1L.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1L |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 570 grams (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $380 | $0 |