Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung HZ25W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was released 3 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W
| TG-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| HZ25W | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
| TG-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the HZ25W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and HZ25W is 91 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and HZ25W.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of files though you need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern TG-2 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 428 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $380 | $350 |