Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung PL200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 2 years after the PL200 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the PL200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung PL200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung PL200
| TG-2 iHS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| PL200 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung PL200
| TG-2 iHS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the PL200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and PL200.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung PL200 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $380 | $0 |