Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is IT100
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung SL820, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 4 years after the SL820 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the SL820 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung SL820
| TG-2 iHS | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SL820 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL820
| TG-2 iHS | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung SL820 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the SL820.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and SL820.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of files however you will want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung SL820 |
| Also Known as | - | IT100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 610k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $380 | $280 |
