Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung ST80, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the ST80 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the ST80 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the ST80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Samsung ST80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung ST80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung ST80
| TG-2 iHS | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST80 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| ST80 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung ST80
| TG-2 iHS | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung ST80 has dimensions of 92mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung ST80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the ST80.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and ST80 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and ST80.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST80 to give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung ST80 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung ST80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung ST80 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 118g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $380 | $249 |