Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 6 months after the WB250F so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung WB250F
| TG-2 iHS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WB250F | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F
| TG-2 iHS | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the WB250F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing specs. The pic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and WB250F.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB250F to provide more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $250 |