Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the WB700 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades against the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung WB700
| TG-2 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | December 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WB700 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k | 610k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB700
| TG-2 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the WB700.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and WB700.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB700 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $300 |