Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB750, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was launched 23 months after the WB750 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the WB750 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung WB750
| TG-2 iHS | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | September 2011 | Newer by 23 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WB750 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB750
| TG-2 iHS | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the WB750.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and WB750 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and WB750.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB750 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | OLED | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | - | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $339 |