Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
57 Imaging
55 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Older Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was unveiled 15 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
| TG-2 iHS | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | April 2012 | Fresher by 15 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Clearer screen (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SD1 Merrill | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sigma SD1 Merrill
| TG-2 iHS | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the SD1 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and SD1 Merrill is 91 and 57 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and SD1 Merrill.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will resolve greater detail having an extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-04-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $2,339 |