Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sigma SD10, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 9 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the SD10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sigma SD10
| TG-2 iHS | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | March 2004 | Fresher by 113 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 130k | Crisper screen (+480k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SD10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sigma SD10
| TG-2 iHS | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sigma SD10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the SD10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and SD10 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and SD10.
Clearly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will produce greater detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 1.8" |
| Display resolution | 610 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $380 | $198 |