Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony A200, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was manufactured 5 years after the A200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony A200
TG-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2008 | More modern by 61 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
A200 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A200
TG-2 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93045/93045bb4ac479508f073a861dfe845f3aa679819" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a0a3/8a0a3986d7c95defcc4878cfe847223acc2662d6" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and A200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will provide more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9964/f996426347984b83fbbc66b5bd5b52f584c03043" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000ca/000cae98f1485e9a4f224e2b83b5be5f7ea189bb" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2013-06-28 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $380 | $100 |