Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony A200, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 5 years after the A200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the A200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony A200
| TG-2 iHS | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | July 2008 | More modern by 61 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A200 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A200
| TG-2 iHS | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the A200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and A200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will provide more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $100 |
