Clicky

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Revealed June 2013
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • Refreshed by Sony A330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is pretty close but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-2 iHS was unveiled 5 years after the A300 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony A300

 TG-2 iHS A300 
AnnouncedJune 2013January 2008More modern by 66 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution610k230kSharper screen (+380k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 A300 TG-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A300

 TG-2 iHS A300 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the A300.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and A300.

Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Sony A300
27
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
59
manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography information
Sony A300 Street photography information
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
74
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Sports photography details
Sony A300 Sports photography details
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery life (350 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography information
Sony A300 Travel photography information
68
good battery life (350 CIPA)
environment proofing
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
45
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography info
Sony A300 Landscape photography info
46
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
good battery life (350 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
57
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
megapixel count low (10MP)
missing Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging details
Sony A300 Vlogging details
36
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
9
can't shoot video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony A300
 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHSSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-06-28 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 610 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230g (0.51 pounds) 632g (1.39 pounds)
Physical dimensions 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $380 $0