Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-C3, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was brought out 23 months after the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the NEX-C3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-C3
TG-2 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
NEX-C3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony NEX-C3
TG-2 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has proportions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31110/311103f6b62dc236d1219100880d540972ec0408" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and NEX-C3 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5bb/9e5bb29fb1ea7034ca2a69480eda683c3624be42" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and NEX-C3.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f62b/6f62b3b1a8ab6be577f5da325ad4edf51a617f22" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/661a8/661a8d46fdb92d7aded326f81372698ef5ed6596" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $343 |