Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-C3
- New Model is Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was brought out 11 months later than the NEX-F3 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the NEX-F3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-F3
TG-2 iHS | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
NEX-F3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3
TG-2 iHS | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae46e/ae46e0505387fc7343a6f4e24fb0bf5441bed7c9" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and NEX-F3 is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2cbe/d2cbebbd3905161a770aa40cc0f7994a7df4f456" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and NEX-F3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-F3 will give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14621/1462106418458fb4b10c47b5b46dcda6e2f81202" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67dd9/67dd9f560cec3b442bafdd4165ad0a1711f86ac6" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | OLED | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 314 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 470 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $380 | $470 |