Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Released July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony HX9V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was released 24 months after the HX9V making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the HX9V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony HX9V
| TG-2 iHS | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| HX9V | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+311k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony HX9V
| TG-2 iHS | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony HX9V has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Sony HX9V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the HX9V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and HX9V is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and HX9V.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony HX9V to render greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 610k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | OLED | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $380 | $328 |