Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-2 iHS was released 14 months earlier than the QX30 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the QX30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony QX30
| TG-2 iHS | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+610k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| QX30 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | June 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX30
| TG-2 iHS | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has dimensions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony QX30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the QX30.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and QX30 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and QX30.
All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony QX30 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older TG-2 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | - |
| Screen resolution | 610k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 200 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $380 | $348 |