Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
              
              89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
 - 3" Fixed Screen
 - ISO 100 - 6400
 - Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
 - 1920 x 1080 video
 - 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
 - 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
 - Introduced June 2013
 
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
 - 3" Tilting Display
 - ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
 - Optical Image Stabilization
 - 3840 x 2160 video
 - 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
 - 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
 - Revealed October 2016
 - Replaced the Sony RX100 IV
 - Newer Model is Sony RX100 VI
 
Photography Glossary        Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") posses totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-2 iHS was launched 4 years before the RX100 V which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the RX100 V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony RX100 V
| TG-2 iHS | RX100 V | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| RX100 V | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 39 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1229k | 610k | Clearer display (+619k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | 
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V
| TG-2 iHS | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display | 
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony RX100 V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony RX100 V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the RX100 V.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and RX100 V is 91 and 89 respectively.
          Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The image here might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and RX100 V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 V will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
          Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
        
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
        
                
        Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony | 
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | 
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact | 
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2016-10-06 | 
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X | 
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 | 
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 | 
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 | 
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 315 | 
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) | 
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.8 | 
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm | 
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting | 
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch | 
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot | 
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% | 
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x | 
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs | 
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs | 
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs | 
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 24.0fps | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 | 
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | 
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | BuiltIn | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 220 pictures | 
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BX1 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes | 
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Cost at release | $380 | $998 |