Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was launched 24 months after the TX55 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the TX55 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony TX55
TG-2 iHS | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
TX55 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 610k | Crisper display (+620k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony TX55
TG-2 iHS | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS offers outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the TX55.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and TX55 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and TX55.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony TX55 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 610k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | OLED | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 109g (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $350 |