Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W220, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the W220 (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 4 years later than the W220 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony W220
| TG-2 iHS | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| W220 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W220
| TG-2 iHS | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides exterior measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the W220.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and W220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and W220.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of images however you really should factor the age of the products into consideration. The more modern TG-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 147g (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $160 |