Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W310, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the W310 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years later than the W310 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS matches up vs the W310 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony W310
| TG-2 iHS | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| W310 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W310
| TG-2 iHS | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony W310 has proportions of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the W310.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and W310 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and W310.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you should always take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W310 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 137 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $380 | $150 |