Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the W320 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony W320
| TG-2 iHS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| W320 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony W320
| TG-2 iHS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the W320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and W320.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Sony W320 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $380 | $269 |