Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-110, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-3 was announced 3 years later than the VG-110 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-3 grades against the VG-110 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus VG-110
| TG-3 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 39 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus TG-3
| VG-110 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-110
| TG-3 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 features physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VG-110 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-3 versus the VG-110.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and VG-110 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and VG-110.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger TG-3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 170 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $150 |