Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-3 was announced 2 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-3 scores versus the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 33 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-3
| VR-320 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus VR-320
| TG-3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 and the VR-320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and VR-320.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-3 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $350 | $179 |