Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was brought out 3 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-3 scores against the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus XZ-1
| TG-3 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 39 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-3
| XZ-1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-1
| TG-3 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the TG-3 and the XZ-1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and XZ-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and XZ-1.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will provide more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $567 |