Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Updated by Olympus TG-4
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The TG-3 was unveiled 16 months later than the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-3 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-3 XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedMarch 2014December 2012Fresher by 16 months

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-3

 XZ-2 iHS TG-3 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-3 XZ-2 iHS 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Examine the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-3 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The newer TG-3 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
37
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
46
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition (247g)
66
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
47
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (330 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
74
better than average battery (330 shots)
environment proof
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247g)
display is not selfie friendly
61
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
56
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
environment proof
better than average battery (330 shots)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
55
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Vlogging details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging details
34
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than competition (247g)
36
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic support
display is not selfie friendly
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus Tough TG-3Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus Tough TG-3 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-03-31 2012-12-18
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lbs) 346 grams (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 340 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-92B Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $350 $450