Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-3 was unveiled 16 months later than the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-3 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-3
XZ-2 iHS | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-3 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The newer TG-3 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $350 | $450 |