Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Successor is Olympus TG-4
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty close but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") posses totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The TG-3 was manufactured 4 years prior to the ZS200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-3 grades vs the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic ZS200

 TG-3 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-3

 ZS200 TG-3 
IntroducedFebruary 2018March 2014More recent by 47 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen resolution1240k460kSharper screen (+780k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic ZS200

 TG-3 ZS200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 has outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 compared to the ZS200.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and ZS200 is 90 and 86 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and ZS200.

Clearly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older TG-3 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography information
37
good MP (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
65
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Street photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography details
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
77
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
offers focus by touch
screen is fixed
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-3
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS200
47
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery (330 CIPA)
slow fps (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
70
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
includes tracking focus
better than average battery life (370 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-3
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS200
74
great battery (330 shots)
environment sealing
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
76
better than average battery life (370 shots)
has bluetooth
offers focus by touch
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography info
56
fairly wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
great battery (330 shots)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
70
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (370 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging factors
34
fairly wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
35
fairly wide (24mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus Tough TG-3Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Tough TG-3 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Also Known as - Lumix DC-TZ200
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-03-31 2018-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Venus Engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Min enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dots 1,240k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lbs) 340 grams (0.75 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 370 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $350 $800