Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty close but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-3 was manufactured 4 years prior to the ZS200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-3 grades vs the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-3 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-3
ZS200 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic ZS200
TG-3 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 has outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 compared to the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f539/6f539da839a11d754e04227bcaeac62f238e0d0f" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and ZS200 is 90 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4cdb/c4cdb0406520372b532c796e3969857de6138375" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and ZS200.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older TG-3 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20024/20024183a440935985f4c07ee74d8b82f77ddc0c" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/209ae/209ae7bc45e6ce64fa416f198f4d38eb4c67ec4d" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 370 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $350 | $800 |