Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-3 was brought out 4 years later than the FH22 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-3 grades against the FH22 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FH22
| TG-3 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 52 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus TG-3
| FH22 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FH22
| TG-3 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 comes with exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-3 vs the FH22.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and FH22 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FH22.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to give more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-3
Portrait photography with Panasonic FH22
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Street photography details
Panasonic FH22 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than competitors (247g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-3 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery power (330 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography details
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography details
good battery power (330 shots)
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors (247 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
comes with focus via touch
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
good battery power (330 shots)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging info
Panasonic FH22 Vlogging info
rather wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competitors (247g)
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $350 | $200 |