Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-3 was unveiled 21 months later than the FZ200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-3 scores versus the FZ200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ200
| TG-3 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 | July 2012 | More recent by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-3
| FZ200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ200
| TG-3 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 provides outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-3 and the FZ200.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and FZ200 is 90 and 65 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ200.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger TG-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 13.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 588g (1.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 540 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $499 |