Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
35
Features
64
Overall
46

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Introduced March 2014
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-3 was unveiled 21 months later than the FZ200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-3 scores versus the FZ200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ200

 TG-3 FZ200 
AnnouncedMarch 2014July 2012More recent by 21 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-3

 FZ200 TG-3 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ200

 TG-3 FZ200 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 provides outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-3 and the FZ200.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and FZ200 is 90 and 65 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ200.

As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger TG-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography details
37
good MP (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
47
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography factors
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than average (247g)
57
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography advice
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery life (330 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
good battery power (540 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Travel photography camera
74
great battery life (330 CIPA)
weather sealing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average (247 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
55
good battery power (540 CIPA)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
really wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (588 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography advice
56
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
weather sealing
great battery life (330 per charge)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
47
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (540 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging advice
34
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
heavier than average (247 grams)
63
really wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have microphone jack
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (588g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus Tough TG-3Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Tough TG-3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-03-31 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT-LCD Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247g (0.54 lb) 588g (1.30 lb)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 114
Other
Battery life 330 images 540 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $350 $499