Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is pretty similar but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was introduced 3 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-3 matches up against the FZ2500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ2500
| TG-3 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-3
| FZ2500 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 | March 2014 | Newer by 30 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ2500
| TG-3 | FZ2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 has got external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 and the FZ2500.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and FZ2500 is 90 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ2500.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged TG-3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 915 gr (2.02 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $998 |