Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
59 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released December 2006
- Refreshed by Pentax K20D
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K10D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and K10D (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was unveiled 7 years after the K10D which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-3 grades versus the K10D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Pentax K10D. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax K10D
| TG-3 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | December 2006 | Newer by 89 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 210k | Sharper display (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-3
| K10D | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K10D
| TG-3 | K10D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax K10D has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K10D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 and the K10D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and K10D is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The image here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and K10D.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-3 will provide you with more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax K10D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax K10D |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2006-12-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 793 grams (1.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 522 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $350 | $700 |