Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
93 Imaging
31 Features
35 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-3 was released 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-3 grades against the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-3 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-3
| CX2 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-3 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-3 vs the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and CX2 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and CX2.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to render more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $341 |