Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-3 was released 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-3 grades against the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-3 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-3
| CX2 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-3 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-3 vs the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and CX2 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and CX2.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to render more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $350 | $341 |