Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Announced October 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh G700SE, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and G700SE (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-3 was unveiled 3 years later than the G700SE and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TG-3 scores versus the G700SE when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Ricoh G700SE. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh G700SE
| TG-3 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | October 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus TG-3
| G700SE | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh G700SE
| TG-3 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 offers physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh G700SE has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh G700SE in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-3 against the G700SE.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and G700SE is 90 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and G700SE.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to show extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh G700SE | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh G700SE |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2010-10-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 307 grams (0.68 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $0 |