Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is very close but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was manufactured 12 months later than the GR which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-3 matches up versus the GR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh GR
| TG-3 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | April 2013 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus TG-3
| GR | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh GR
| TG-3 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 features external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-3 compared to the GR.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and GR is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The visual below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and GR.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor sizing. The TG-3 uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving bokeh more challenging. The fresher TG-3 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GR |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 290 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $971 |
