Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The TG-3 was revealed 4 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-3 scores vs the GR Digital III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-3
GR Digital III | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 offers outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-3 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 against the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ed18/7ed18f5d8703252e334436652ce6e5b77bc3b8ca" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49d2b/49d2b31b436c580db97eab084ac301f4fad50449" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The graphic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and GR Digital III.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will provide more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf59a/cf59a4d2e1eb21b3da788032e4444bbedbc947c1" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/794ef/794ef326dda623752d976f1e0b651d6823fdf29f" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $350 | $399 |