Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-3 was unveiled 2 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-3 grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TG-3 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus TG-3
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TG-3 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 has outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a250/3a2502bd42b60d51a71f4bcbcab8ac411edb1d50" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f6f0/5f6f044cd7d5256234448679dc075a30f05c64f8" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-3 has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging. The fresher TG-3 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7432e/7432ea2cb08360611b3691ca610405a09fc9cf8e" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bdf1/3bdf1df404eb85cd31820083255ffb672290490a" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 400 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $350 | $871 |