Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") use different sensor sizes.

The TG-3 was announced 4 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-3 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TG-3 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | March 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-3
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TG-3 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 provides external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-3 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will give you more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $350 | $349 |