Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung CL5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") possess different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-3 was brought out 5 years after the CL5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-3 matches up versus the CL5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung CL5
| TG-3 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus TG-3
| CL5 | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung CL5
| TG-3 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 provides external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 versus the CL5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and CL5 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and CL5.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will result in greater detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer TG-3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also Known as | - | PL10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $350 | $391 |