Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-3 was manufactured 7 years after the GX-10 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-3 scores against the GX-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-3 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 92 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-3
| GX-10 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10
| TG-3 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the TG-3 versus the GX-10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and GX-10 is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger TG-3 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $850 |