Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-3 was manufactured 7 years after the GX-10 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-3 scores against the GX-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-3 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 92 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-3
| GX-10 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10
| TG-3 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the TG-3 versus the GX-10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and GX-10 is 90 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger TG-3 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $850 |