Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-3 was unveiled 5 years after the HZ15W which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-3 grades versus the HZ15W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung HZ15W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung HZ15W
| TG-3 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus TG-3
| HZ15W | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung HZ15W
| TG-3 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 versus the HZ15W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and HZ15W is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and HZ15W.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to show greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $330 |