Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was revealed 3 years later than the HZ50W and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-3 scores against the HZ50W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung HZ50W
| TG-3 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | May 2010 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus TG-3
| HZ50W | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung HZ50W
| TG-3 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 has got physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung HZ50W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 against the HZ50W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and HZ50W.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to give extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $250 |