Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d9c5/5d9c596e29e0a8e6ee230208f428277550917c6f" alt="Samsung NX1 front Samsung NX1 front"
66 Imaging
67 Features
90 Overall
76
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Released September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and NX1 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-3 was introduced 5 months prior to the NX1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-3 matches up vs the NX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung NX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung NX1
TG-3 | NX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Olympus TG-3
NX1 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+576k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung NX1
TG-3 | NX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | September 2014 | Same age |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1 has measurements of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 vs the NX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc7db/fc7db9f7cbbc246d34ed24880756ec2a1c54502b" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and NX1 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2e879c19c15ea733cb3a03310bedb63357e" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specifications. The photograph here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and NX1.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-3 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX1 will render more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e568a/e568a715a82fdbdad4c647caa31f478f028fd6b0" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c95b/1c95bd11b5fd020e36c3a19b12a8d2acf1e2cc58" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung NX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung NX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2014-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 209 |
Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 15.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.265 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1363 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 500 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | BP1900 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $350 | $1,500 |