Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-3 was introduced 5 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-3 scores versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung SL102
TG-3 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | January 2009 | More modern by 64 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus TG-3
SL102 | TG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung SL102
TG-3 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 versus the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and SL102.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to produce more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $130 |