Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-3 was manufactured 3 months after the WB350F and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-3 grades vs the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-3 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-3
| WB350F | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB350F
| TG-3 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | January 2014 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-3 vs the WB350F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The image below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and WB350F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of pictures however you need to take the release date of the products into consideration.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $350 | $260 |