Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-3 was brought out 15 months later than the WB800F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-3 grades against the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung WB800F
TG-3 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus TG-3
WB800F | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB800F
TG-3 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-3 and the WB800F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f663f/f663f3521c5a382aacfd61555346fa4ebab9690f" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0e79/a0e791b8625332ebcceb3d01495ddb4e52e9455b" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The visual below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and WB800F.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should really consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-3 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/579bd/579bd0be1e8c789ee52558c5dba3b9bd7c9f1dce" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1985/d1985b294250be96581f0429f9da5f8503dd6ff3" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $350 | $300 |